Old Marston Parish Council: voter’s plea for information

This is a guest blog by Old Marston resident Colin @theabingdontaxi

[Updated with minor revisions 23 June 2014. See the candidates’ personal statements here.]

It has always been an article of faith for me to vote in every election for which I have been eligible and that is now more than fifty elections. From my overseas travels, I know this to be a privilege, but also a responsibility and for me, a duty. So it was with some excitement that I learned of the historic event in The Village on 22 May, that we were to be issued with three ballot papers and that there was to be a combined poll for the European Parliament, Oxford City Council and Old Marston Parish Council. Fourteen candidates put themselves forward for twelve seats(1).

The election to the parish council was postponed on 06 May(2), due to the death of one of the nominated candidates, but rearranged as required(3) for 26 June 2014, as there remained 13 validly nominated candidates for 12 seats(1). My interest in Old Marston Parish Council was further piqued by a poll card, which was handed to me by The Village Postman on 27 May, so I set out to find out more about what the parish council is, what it does and how on earth I am to decide which of my up to 12 votes to exercise on Thursday 26 June.

Old Marston is one of only four parished areas within Oxford City Council. The city of Oxford has been an unparished area, where those functions traditionally carried out by a parish council have been carried out by the city. Parish councils were created as a result of nineteenth century legislation, to separate functions previously carried out at a local level by a variety of ecclesiastical bodies and today are completely separate from the Church of England – and not to be confused with their parochial church councils! Old Marston (and the nearby parish of Risinghurst and Sandhills) was until the early 1990s on the edge of South Oxfordshire, a large and diverse predominantly rural district, with many parish councils. The two parish councils were simply carried forward into Oxford, when their areas became part of the city. The city council does have the power to abolish existing parish councils, or to create further civil parishes within the city – but thus far the only areas where this has occurred are Blackbird Leys and Littlemore.

Parish councils within Oxford do have the “unfettered right”(4) to raise money by means of a demand on the city council, known as the ‘parish precept’, which the city then collects from those of us who live in the parished area of Old Marston, in the form of Council Tax. They only have one function which is a duty, to provide allotments, but a wide range of discretionary powers:

  • Allotments
  • Baths and washhouses
  • Burial grounds, cemeteries and crematoria
  • Bus shelters
  • Bye-laws
  • Clocks
  • Closed churchyards
  • Common pastures
  • Conference facilities
  • Community centres
  • Crime prevention
  • Drainage
  • Dogs
  • Entertainment and the arts
  • Flyposting and Graffiti
  • Gifts
  • Highways
  • Investments
  • Land
  • Litter
  • Lotteries
  • Mortuaries and post mortem rooms
  • Open spaces
  • Parish documents
  • Telecommunications facilities
  • Public buildings
  • Public conveniences
  • Town and country planning
  • Tourism
  • Traffic calming
  • Transport
  • War memorials
  • Water supply
  • General “Well-Being”

Old Marston Parish Council stresses that it is run on non-party political lines – none of the candidates on 26 June have party political labels. They say they don’t have the bureaucracy of the city council and thus that things can move quickly, on local issues such as overgrown footpaths, which can often be attended to the same day(5). It sees its value in a whole range of local areas:(5).

  • that the parish council as a landowner helps to protect the setting of The Village from being over developed
  • that they will fund and support local events events such as the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012
  • that they can help to raise funds for new equipment for the Mortimer Hall recreation ground
  • that the Village Burial Ground is maintained on a voluntary basis, but that the parish council pays for materials
  • that they provide and maintain facilities for the community, such as Boults Lane recreation ground
  • that they are obliged to be consulted by the city council on planning applications, an important facility, following the ending of letters to neighbouring properties as part of panning applications
  • that grants are provided to local community groups, such as the Scouts, Marston Wives and the local bell ringers
  • that members of the parish council organise and take part in the annual litter pick around The Village

Other than the statutory notices, in Old Marston, there has been no publicity whatsoever for the individual candidates in this election, which will cost the taxpayers of The Village a few thousand pounds(5). There has not been a ballot in this parish for 16 years(5) and although I have lived in The Village for three years now, prior to researching this blog, I knew of only one of the candidates. So as a parishioner – I have set out to write to them all, individually, to find out more about them and why they think I should vote for them. The responses will be published on this blog, if and as they come in, in the same neutral format, which has been utilised for previous elections in Marston https://www.tonyox3.com/2014/05/candidates-in-marston.html, though of course, the right is reserved to edit contributions, where required, for reasons of brevity.

Some would argue that this is the wrong way around and that those seeking our vote should be contacting us. This should be the case, but in a first past the post electoral system, where I have up to 12 votes on one ballot paper and in the event of an almost total lack of information on the candidates, I am prepared to take the initiative, so that at least I may know that I have done everything I can in the exercise of the right to vote.

Candidates for Old Marston Parish Council election on Thursday, 26 June 2014. Those marked with an asterisk * have provided personal statements – see follow-up article.

  • Nils Bartleet *
  • John Batey *
  • Michael Cadd *
  • Peter Cox *
  • Tony Greenfield *
  • Patricia Hall *
  • Duncan Hatfield *
  • Charlie Haynes *
  • Barry Lewis *
  • Michael O’Keefe
  • Peter Sarac
  • Angie Tiwari
  • Peter Williams *

Useful web sites:
Old Marston Parish Council, PDF map of Old Marston civil parish
Old Marston Parish Council
Oxford City Council is responsible for organising this election, which it will then charge the cost back to the parish council. Their statutory notices and other information for this election is on their page Elections in 2014
Risinghurst & Sandhills Parish Council (site not updated since November 2013).

Sources:
(1) Oxford City Council, Election of Parish Councillors for the Parish of Old Marston, Statement of Persons Nominated, 25 April 2014
(2) Oxford City Council, Election of Parish Councillors for the Parish of Old Marston, notice of Cancellation of Poll, 06 May 2014
(3) Local Elections (Parishes and Communities) (England and Wales) Rules 2006, Rule 55
(4) Association of Council Secretaries and Solicitors, Society of Local Council Clerks, The Standards Board for England, National Association of Local Councils, Local Government Association, Milton Keynes Council, Governance Toolkit for Parish & Town Councils, version three, April 2009
(5)Conversation at The Village Pub with member of Old Marston Parish Council, 28 May 2014
(6) Telephone conversation with Elections Unit, Oxford City Council, 27 May 2014
(7) Old Marston Parish Council, web site, ‘Profiles’, http://www.oldmarston-pc.gov.uk/michael_cadd.html, as consulted 23 June 2014
(8) ibid., http://www.oldmarston-pc.gov.uk/barry_lewis.html, as consulted 23 June 2014

Your new Euro MEPs

Unless you live in a isolation chamber you’ll already know that despite Oxford’s best efforts to support Labour the results of the European elections in the South-East region of which we are part are that we have

  • 4 UKIP
  • 3 Conservative
  • 1 Green
  • 1 Labour
  • 1 LibDem

MEPs.

The good news is they are all on twitter, so you can raise any issues you like with them in 140 characters or less. Here they are in alphabetical order. Hit those ‘Follow’ buttons now!

Name Party twitter
Richard Ashworth Con @RichardAshMEP
Janice Atkinson UKIP @JaniceUKIP
Catherine Bearder LibDem @catherineMEP
Nirj Deva Con @NirjDeva
Annaliese Dodds Lab @AnnelieseDodds
Nigel Farage UKIP @Nigel_Farage
Ray Finch UKIP @raymondfinch
Dan Hannan Con @DanHannanMEP
Diane James UKIP @DianeUKIP
Keith Taylor Green @GreenKeithMEP

Local election round-up for OX3

There were no real surprises about the results in the six OX3 wards. The LibDems not unexpectedly lost their seat in Headington Hill & Northway to Labour, but given that Labour won there in 2012 with a big majority and with the LibDems in fourth place it was no surprise. The LibDem’s sitting councillor Altaf Khan moved to stand successfully in Headington Ward, taking the seat vacated by David Rundle who had stood down. All the other wards re-elected the sitting candidates.

The media hype surrounding UKIP didn’t play out into any significant achievements for them. Their best performance was in Barton and Sandhills where they came a good second with 19.2% of the vote. They also came second in Churchill with 15.4%, beating the Greens into third place by just 15 votes. In Marston they could only manage fourth with 10.2%.

As I write I haven’t got the individual turnout figures for each ward. In Oxford as a whole turnout was 37%, up from 29% in 2012. The six wards all had higher numbers of votes cast this year than in 2012.

Ward-by-ward:

Barton & Sandhills

UKIP came in and took 19% of the vote, almost all from Labour who lost 16 percentage points. The Green vote was down slightly by about 3 percentage points and the Conservatives were down slightly too. The total vote was up 34% on 2012.

Churchill

It was a similar story in Churchill where UKIP took percentage share off all other parties in achieving a 15.4% share of the vote, but Labour were the big losers with their share down 19 percentage points. The total vote was up 7.5%.

Headington

The LibDems took the seat, with their share slightly down by about 3 percentage points.  Labour’s share also dropped by about the same amunt. The Greens were up 3.6 percentage points despite not campaigning, and the Conservatives were up almost 3 percentage points after an active campaign by their new candidate. The overall votes were up an impressive 53%, a tribute to the campaigning efforts of the LibDem team in support of their candidate.

Headington Hill & Northway

Labour (who won in 2012) took the seat with an almost unchanged share of the vote, and the Greens’ share was similarly almost unchanged. The LibDem share fell by 1.3 percentage points: their sitting candidate had moved to stand successfully in Headington Ward. UKIP’s candidate in 2012 was on the ballot paper with no allegiance but had announced he didn’t want to be considered a candidate. He nevertheless polled 1.6% of the vote compared to just under 8% in 2012. The overall vote was up 20%.

Marston

A confusing picture here. In 2012 an Independent won with a 46% share of the vote. This year UKIP fielded a candidate who achieved a 10% share. Conservatives, Greens and LibDems all increased their share of the vote but the big gain was for Labour who took the seat with over 53% of the vote, up from 33% in 2012. In contrast with the other wards, the total votes here only increased by 3%.

Quarry & Risinghurst

With no UKIP candidate this year their 4% share of the 2012 vote was available to the other candidates. Labour held the seat with a share 6 percentage points lower than 2012; the LibDem vote was up slightly (1.4 percentage points), Conservatives increased by 1.1 percentage points but the Green vote went up by a comparatively large 7.3 percentage points. The overall voting numbers were up 26% on 2012.