The official website for these elections has gone live and has details on all the candidates. Find the Thames Valley candidates at www.choosemypcc.org.uk.

Independent candidate Geoff Howard’s details are there, and I’ve summarised them below in the same format as the other candidates in my previous post.

Geoff Howard, Independent

Background: Former Head of Department in a Slough Secondary School. Businessman for 27 years. Magistrate for 20 years chairing Adult and Youth Courts in Berkshire. Former Slough Borough Councillor for 13 years.

Headlines: Politics should play no part in this role. Manage efficiency savings: no reduction in ‘bobbies on the beat’.

Top 3 crime priorities: Concentrate on tackling crimes that affect people locally. Manage efficiency savings demanded by Government without damaging the interests of the community. [Note: The choosemypcc website doesn’t ask this specific question so I have extracted this from GH’s statement.]

I’ll read the other candidates’ statements later and if there is anything new I’ll post it.

Voting procedure

If you’ve had the booklet from the Electoral Commission through your letterbox you’ve probably seen that you’ll be able to vote for up to 2 candidates. What it doesn’t tell you is how the votes will be counted – you have to look that up on a website called aboutmyvote.co.uk. It’s called the “supplementary vote system” and to save you the trouble, here’s how it works:-

• Put a cross in the first column against your first-choice candidate.
• If you don’t want to vote for a second choice, that’s it, you’ve finished.
• If you want to vote for a second choice, put a cross against your second choice in the second column. (Yes, it’s a good idea for your second choice to be for a different candidate from your first choice or you’ll confuse the system.)
• That’s it. Put your ballot paper in the box.
• When the votes are counted, all the first choices are counted first. If any candidate gets more than 50% of the votes cast they are elected. Otherwise …
• It becomes a count-off between the two candidates with the highest number of votes. The ballot papers for all but the top two candidates are re-counted, and any of their second choice votes which are for either of the top two candidates are added to those candidates’ numbers.
• The winner is the candidate with the higher number of votes at the end of this second count.

I hope that’s all clear. And no, I don’t know why they’re using this system. If anybody does please leave a comment.

To start you thinking about who to vote for I’ve compiled a summary of the six Thames Valley candidates’ statements from www.policeelections.com. It’s my personal selection from their profiles and views: I’ve tried to be neutral but you (and they) may criticise or disagree with my choices. At the end I’ve put two questions to the candidates which I’ve invited them to answer.

Patience Awe, Independent

Background: Worked in various sectors, as a front office cashier, teacher, insurance marketing executive, banker, software tester, IT Capacity Planner, Project Manager. Also served as a Charity Trustee.

Headlines: Keep party politics out of policing. Rebuild trust – mutual respect between the Police and the public, so local people can be represented impartially.

Top 3 crime priorities: Set up rape crisis centres where needed in Thames Valley eg Reading, tackle causes of anti-social behaviour and crime against properties. Be mindful of the fact that, I have to first engage with the press and public, review the police crime plan and budget, engage with community partnerships, review processes and procedures before implementation.

Barry Cooper, UKIP

Background: No professional experience with the criminal justice system. Look at the issues and realities facing the police with an unprejudiced and fresh pair of eyes.

Headlines: Oppose cuts in police funding. Put rights of victim above rights of offender. Tough on crime.

Top 3 crime priorities: A zero-tolerance approach to “gateway” level crime such as anti-social behaviour and so-called “petty” crime. A reduction of response times for crime callouts so that people who are the victims of crime receive prompt and efficient help from the police. A reduction of the number of reported crimes that go un-investigated; the current rates are inexcusable and largely due to resources that should be focused on police work chasing traffic offense quotas or filling out endless reams of paperwork.

Geoff Howard, Independent

Background: No information on www.policeelections.com, but the Green Reading blog says he is or was a Slough Borough councillor for 13 years, now estate agent.

John Howson,LibDem

Background: Former teacher, lecturer, business owner, and government adviser with more than 20 years experience of criminal justice system.

Headlines: Policing by consent. Building trust.

Top 3 crime priorities: Working with the Chief Constable and other agencies on how to prevent crime, increasing detection rates to the best possible levels across the force with the resources available, and ensuring everyone who is a victim of crime is dealt with to the same level by the police.

Anthony Stansfeld, Conservative

Background: Soldier, aviator, explorer, businessman, councillor, and an experienced member of the Police Authority.

Headlines: Member of the Police Authority for past 6 years. Responsible for introducing Neighbourhood Policing. Chaired the Performance Committee which sets the police targets and monitors performance.

Top 3 crime priorities: Household burglary, rural crime including metal theft, Anti Social behaviour.

Tim Starkey, Labour

Background: Barrister: experience working both as a prosecutor and a defence lawyer. Advised on criminal justice policy.

Headlines: Strong opponent of 20% police cuts, also advocate of reforms to modernise police service. Building parnerships with other agencies. Crack down on waste.

Top 3 crime priorities: 1) Working with councils and the voluntary sector to tackle anti-social behaviour and find positive alternatives for young people 2) Working to reduce drug addiction which is the cause of most burglaries 3) Support victims of domestic violence thus securing more convictions.

Finally I’d like to ask the candidates two questions. I hope they will all enter into the spirit and engage in the debate.

1. The Chief Constable of the Thames Valley Police is looking at ways to increase the deployment of tasers. What are your views on this?
2. If you are elected how many support staff will you have? What will the budget be for your office?